Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

From: Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com>
Cc: spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project
Date: 2016-05-06 17:02:44
Message-ID: 87shxvruff.fsf@rover.gag.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com> writes:

> I haven't seen any conversation with the board about what they need,
> what they are looking for, etc.
>
> I don't know how I should vote on a resolution without any prior
> conversation at all.
>
> Why hasn't Mark been in contact with the board?

He talked to me. The needs and expectations seemed simple enough that I
didn't think a lot of conversation would be required, but part of the
reason for including spi-private and spi-general here was so that
discussion can occur, so go for it!

Bdale

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-05-06 17:34:59 Re: [Spi-private] SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project
Previous Message Martin Michlmayr 2016-05-05 22:59:52 Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project