Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors

From: Tim Potter <tpot(at)frungy(dot)org>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors
Date: 2020-01-08 05:45:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On 10 Dec 2019, at 10:19 am, Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com> wrote:
> * Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> [2019-12-09 15:59]:
>> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
>> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
>> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
> Make sure reality is reflected.
> The annual report lists the advisors, but they haven't been consulted
> in years, so imho it makes sense to reflect that. It also creates
> more balance between projects (why is the Debian project leader always
> an advisor?)

Just curious - is there was any more discussion on this topic? Perhaps
we can make a decision one way or the other at the board meeting next week.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Michlmayr 2020-01-12 16:09:27 Treasurer's report for 2019-12
Previous Message Philippe Cloutier 2019-12-18 00:07:38 SPI Advisors and Gender Imbalance (was Re: Spi-general Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2)