| From: | Peter Cock <p(dot)j(dot)a(dot)cock(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OBF as associated project, formal resolution |
| Date: | 2012-10-01 14:57:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKVJ-_7=TiR+cJDGbDmqu4YHG_nEND+vayeLzT8sL5764==AkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Ian Jackson
<ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes ("OBF as associated project, formal resolution"):
>> 4. Hilmar Lapp is recognised by SPI as the authoritative decision maker
>> and SPI liaison for TideSDK. Future liaisons will be the same person
>> who is president of the OBF at that time, elected according to the
>> bylaws at: http://www.open-bio.org/wiki/File:OBF-Bylaws.pdf
>
> Is Hilmar Lapp really the autocrat for this project ? Or should we
> have something more like the text we have for Debian ? Or
> something in between ?
>
> Ian.
I'm not sure how you are using the term autocrat, but Hilmer Lapp
is the current OBF president if that's what you are asking:
http://www.open-bio.org/wiki/Board
Peter
(OBF Board member)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2012-10-01 15:25:17 | Re: OBF as associated project, formal resolution |
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2012-10-01 12:48:33 | Re: OBF as associated project, formal resolution |