| From: | Lynn Winebarger <owinebar(at)indiana(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Darren O(dot) Benham" <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bylaws Revision: VOTING[4] |
| Date: | 1999-05-28 19:33:02 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.9905281427410.29384-100000@se232.math.indiana.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Fri, 28 May 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 11:07:11AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > SPI is a nonprofit and thus the term stockholders does not
> > apply and might give a wrong impression.
> What term would you use to convey the method of voting that SPI is trying
> to achieve?
I thought the cooperative and its members model was pretty apt.
> Debian voter turn out for elections seems to be around 22-28% unless it's a
> major election. For example, the leader election was about 50% (give or
> take). Since the board is supposed to do most of the grunt work, if it's
> not of the same caliber of interest, more discussion needs to go into it or
> the propsal needs to be reconsidered.
>
Interesting - what are the requirements for a Debian voting membership?
Here it seems the voting will be limited to contributing members, who may
(or may not) have a higher interest in participating. And the model here
seems like it will be more like the committees do a good deal of the grunt
work.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Darren O. Benham | 1999-05-28 19:37:03 | Re: Bylaws Revision: VOTING[4] |
| Previous Message | Darren O. Benham | 1999-05-28 18:45:55 | Re: Bylaws Revision: VOTING[4] |