Re: Amended Resolution

From: David Graham <cdlu(at)railfan(dot)ca>
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Amended Resolution
Date: 2003-10-09 20:24:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.55.0310091622420.8128@baffin
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

The board should appoint an interim board member (the DPL would be a good
candidate) on a mandate that he shall serve until and only until the
by-law referendum and/or an election is complete, or until January 1st,
which ever comes first.

David "cdlu" Graham
Guelph, Ontario

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, John Goerzen wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:33:23PM -0400, David Graham wrote:
> > I would support a by-law referendum instead of a board election now,
> > following which the board would hold an election under either the current
> > by-laws or the new ones, depending on the outcome of the referendum.
> That makes very good sense.
> My only concern is how quickly we could make that happen. In the mean
> time, the board is in a questionable status as it doesn't have the amount of
> members mandated by the current bylaws.
> -- John


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-10-09 20:34:35 Re: Amended Resolution
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-10-09 20:22:06 Re: Amended Resolution