Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC

From: Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: SPI Board <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC
Date: 2012-06-15 00:41:18
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.1206151024590.9652@castor.opentrend.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-announce spi-general

On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:

> I'm afraid I've had a bit to drink now, but:

Uh oh, I think we're off to a bad start :)

> This is absolutely ridiculous. Do yuo have no reading comprehension
> whatsoever ? What on earth do _you_ think "authortitative
> decisionmaker" means ? Do you have access to a dictionary ?

Actually my reading comprehension is very good, but thanks for asking. I
explained my understanding of the term and the reasons behind it back on
May 25. No need to repeat them again.

>> I disagree on this point. My position is that we should definitely have
>> counsel review any proposed resolution template before we put it in to
>> action. This need not be an onerous process. SFLC has been very quick to
>> respond to our queries in the past. I am very impressed by the service
>> they have been providing us.
>
> This is absolutely ridiculous. This "resolution template" was put

Yes, so you've said twice already :)

> into action without legal review and now you are treating it as some
> kind of immutable gospel and refusing to budge from it!

Actually I have stated on numerous occassions my willingness to change the
wording. I just do not wish to change it in the manner you have
suggested.

In a worst case scenario the wording of a resolution could be interpretted
by a court of competent jurisdiction. Even if the original wording was
not reviewed by a lawyer I don't want to compound the problem by changing
the resolution without proper consideration at this time. There is
increased interested among FOSS projects to use fiscal sponsorship and
this is a good time to review the wording of the resolution template[1].

[1] I hadn't mentioned it earlier but moves towards this were already
afoot before you raised the concern.

> Apparently you have convinced a majority of the board.
> This is absolutely ridiculous. Don't they have any reading
> comprehension either ???

My experiences with the board would lead me to conclude that they have
excellent reading comprehension, some of them in several languages.

:)

Speaking only for myself as an individual director, as always.

Rob

--
Director, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
Email: robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode)
Web: http://www.spi-inc.org
Free and Open Source: The revolution that quietly changed the world

Browse spi-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-06-27 22:04:55 Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2012-06-15 00:00:13 Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-06-19 18:12:36 Open Bioinformatics Foundation as Associated Project
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2012-06-15 00:00:13 Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC