| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi(at)free(dot)fr>, Chris Lamb <leader(at)debian(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, debian-project(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |
| Date: | 2017-08-31 18:53:06 |
| Message-ID: | b65f263e-adc6-1ec7-49a7-45fe31e91202@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 08/31/2017 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"):
>> On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
>>> do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
>>
>> The vendor should apply for their own EANs. If Debian/SPI applies for
>> them it will provide a communication of validity to the vendor
>> ("Official Debian Images").
>>
>> +1 for Debian not allowing an external vendor to appear as the official
>> distributor (unless they actually are).
>
> I'm not sure I follow everything you said there, but it sounds to me
> like you are happy with my proposed letter. If I have misunderstood
> then I'm afraid you'll have to clarify...
We are good.
Thanks,
JD
>
> Regards,
> Ian.
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Schultheiss | 2017-09-04 23:49:04 | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2017-08-31 18:32:50 | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |