| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)drycafe(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Date: | 2016-11-17 20:05:53 |
| Message-ID: | ba2ef8cc-764a-6e8c-d61c-894789b03e35@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 11/17/2016 11:33 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> if we pay staff, at a minimum we must pay who manages that staff.
>
> I don’t think that’s necessarily true. If the staff is a contractor, then whatever management is needed is normally factored into the rate.
My experience is that this is patently false. You could have a complete,
100% autonomous, rock-star of a contractor. There still needs to be
someone who manages the purpose, todo, communications etc... of that
contractor to the person/team/department that is in charge of what they do.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hilmar Lapp | 2016-11-17 20:15:57 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-11-17 20:04:20 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |