| From: | Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list) |
| Date: | 2016-11-07 02:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | e309ef9d-f0dd-ea5b-1822-0db2433d0585@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-26 21:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 05:49 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> Hi Joshua,
>>
>> On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>>> This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
>>>
>>>>> Right so there are many types of legal issues. The one you bring up is
>>>>> fine to be public. However there are others that are not.
>>>>
>>>> Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and,
>>>> of course, which has to be)?
>>>
>>> A health issue of a board member.
>>
>> I suppose that was not an example legal issue, right?
>
> It is if we discuss it publicly.
>
Are you saying that discussing a health issue of a board member on a public mailing list would present a legal issue?
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filipus Klutiero | 2016-11-07 02:14:57 | Issues with public discussions of legal issues (Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list)) |
| Previous Message | Neil McGovern | 2016-10-27 12:46:41 | Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list) |