Re: [DRAFT 1] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES

Lists: spi-general
From: Nils Lohner <lohner(at)typhoon(dot)icd(dot)teradyne(dot)com>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph(at)lameter(dot)com>
Cc: Dale Scheetz <dwarf(at)polaris(dot)net>, "Darren O(dot) Benham" <gecko(at)benham(dot)net>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DRAFT 1] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Date: 1999-04-08 20:52:02
Message-ID: 199904082052.QAA21303@typhoon.icd.teradyne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general


Here's the thinking. Forming committees is not trivial since writing a
charter takes time. I think people should just get up and do what needs to
be done... sort of the way it is in Debian. I never officially got to be
assigned as the 'Press Contact', I just started doing the work with IWJs
approval and kept going. Now I think that a Publicity Committee would be
appropriate, for both Debian and SPI. But I think that one time or short
term things should just get done without going through the longer process of
forming a committee.

So, if people want to do something, ask a board member, and if its a trivial
task (i.e. no large political ramifications, etc.) should be able to just do
it. If it's a larger issue that takes some time, let people discuss it and
deal with it as designated by the board, and if it's an issue that requires
long term care, or is a recurring issue (publicity, trade shows, trademarks,
projects, etc.) then form a committee. This concept is not that tough.

Sorry for the brief style, but I'm in a hurry.

Nils.

In message <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)03(dot)9904081322520(dot)2818-100000(at)cyrix200(dot)lameter(dot)com>,
Chri
stoph Lameter writes:
>So board members alone are dealing with one time issues and there is a
>prohibition against forming a committee for that purpose?
>
>I am confused about this rule.
>
>On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 12:13:17PM -0400, Nils Lohner wrote:
>> > > > Committees are an extension of the board of directors and take care o
>f the
>> > > > day to day operation of the organization. They are set up to deal wit
>h
>> > > > ongoing issues within the organization.
>> > > Committees are an extension of the board of directors and take care of t
>he
>> > > daily ongoing concerns of the organization|corporation. They are not to
> be
>> > > formed for one-time or short term situations.
>> >
>> > How do we deal with short term situations or one time issues?
>>
>> If there is no current committee that is appropriate, I would assume that
>> one of the board members would do the work, after consutation with fellow
>> board members.
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to spi-general-request(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
>
>


From: Christoph Lameter <christoph(at)lameter(dot)com>
To: Nils Lohner <lohner(at)typhoon(dot)icd(dot)teradyne(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DRAFT 1] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Date: 1999-04-08 21:08:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.03.9904081407180.3121-100000@cyrix200.lameter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Ok ;-) Translation for me: SPI is run informal unless there is really an
issue demanding constant attention by a committee. Then we go through all
the trouble with charter etc.

On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Nils Lohner wrote:

>
> Here's the thinking. Forming committees is not trivial since writing a
> charter takes time. I think people should just get up and do what needs to
> be done... sort of the way it is in Debian. I never officially got to be
> assigned as the 'Press Contact', I just started doing the work with IWJs
> approval and kept going. Now I think that a Publicity Committee would be
> appropriate, for both Debian and SPI. But I think that one time or short
> term things should just get done without going through the longer process of
> forming a committee.
>
> So, if people want to do something, ask a board member, and if its a trivial
> task (i.e. no large political ramifications, etc.) should be able to just do
> it. If it's a larger issue that takes some time, let people discuss it and
> deal with it as designated by the board, and if it's an issue that requires
> long term care, or is a recurring issue (publicity, trade shows, trademarks,
> projects, etc.) then form a committee. This concept is not that tough.
>
> Sorry for the brief style, but I'm in a hurry.
>
> Nils.
>
>
> In message <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)03(dot)9904081322520(dot)2818-100000(at)cyrix200(dot)lameter(dot)com>,
> Chri
> stoph Lameter writes:
> >So board members alone are dealing with one time issues and there is a
> >prohibition against forming a committee for that purpose?
> >
> >I am confused about this rule.
> >
> >On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 12:13:17PM -0400, Nils Lohner wrote:
> >> > > > Committees are an extension of the board of directors and take care o
> >f the
> >> > > > day to day operation of the organization. They are set up to deal wit
> >h
> >> > > > ongoing issues within the organization.
> >> > > Committees are an extension of the board of directors and take care of t
> >he
> >> > > daily ongoing concerns of the organization|corporation. They are not to
> > be
> >> > > formed for one-time or short term situations.
> >> >
> >> > How do we deal with short term situations or one time issues?
> >>
> >> If there is no current committee that is appropriate, I would assume that
> >> one of the board members would do the work, after consutation with fellow
> >> board members.
> >
> >
> >--
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to spi-general-request(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> >
> >
>
>
>


From: "Darren O(dot) Benham" <gecko(at)benham(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DRAFT 1] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Date: 1999-04-08 22:16:25
Message-ID: 19990408151625.A20811@darren.benham.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 02:08:33PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Ok ;-) Translation for me: SPI is run informal unless there is really an
> issue demanding constant attention by a committee. Then we go through all
> the trouble with charter etc.
>
I'm not sure what "informal" would mean in this case... Most of the
one-time-stuff should be able to be put under a committee without having to
stretch it too far.

Inother words, for any show, it's the responsiblity of the Publicity Team
even if that means delegating it (allowed in the charter, for this example)
to someone that'll actually be attending. If the person has a problem or
question, he'd take it to the Publicity Team as the SPI authority in these
matters.

--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko(at)debian(dot)org> <secretary(at)debian(dot)org> <lintian-maint(at)debian(dot)org> *
* <webmaster(at)debian(dot)org> <gecko(at)fortunet(dot)com> <webmaster(at)spi-inc(dot)org> *
=========================================================================