Re: Membership question

Lists: spi-general
From: Ed Boraas <ed(at)tao(dot)ca>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Membership question
Date: 2000-08-23 04:15:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10008230411030.12709-100000@dojo.tao.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On the subject of introductions...

I've been on this list for some time now (seeing very little traffic, of
course). I'm a Debian maintainer (ed(at)debian(dot)org), and am intersted in SPI
membership. One quick question, though: are Debian maintainers entitled to
SPI membership automatically (ie., ex oficio)? If not, is there any
membership procedure established thus far, or is that still being
determined?

-Ed


From: Martin Schulze <joey(at)finlandia(dot)Infodrom(dot)North(dot)DE>
To: Ed Boraas <ed(at)tao(dot)ca>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Membership question
Date: 2000-08-23 06:27:38
Message-ID: 20000823082738.O20681@finlandia.infodrom.north.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Ed Boraas wrote:
> On the subject of introductions...
>
> I've been on this list for some time now (seeing very little traffic, of
> course). I'm a Debian maintainer (ed(at)debian(dot)org), and am intersted in SPI
> membership. One quick question, though: are Debian maintainers entitled to
> SPI membership automatically (ie., ex oficio)? If not, is there any
> membership procedure established thus far, or is that still being
> determined?

That was the plan back in the old days. IIRC it was agreed that this
can't be done legally, thus whoever wants to be a member needs to apply
on his own, implicit membership is not provided. (afair)

Regards,

Joey

--
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
Oldenburger LinuxTag 2000 http://oldenburger.linuxtage.de/