| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Date: | 2016-11-17 19:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | 02b68d66-4a31-7043-9b25-9a591e60af4a@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 11/17/2016 10:59 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> That's not relevant to why we need an admin. Nor has anyone suggested
> hiring a fundraiser.
>
> SPI is at this point a $500K organization. It is downright
> irresponsible of us not to have paid staff to handle the paperwork.
> Sooner or later, we will miss some important piece of paperwork and get
> disaccredited.
Correct, which is why I am an advocate of paid officers. I am not
opposed to office staff either of course, but if we pay staff, at a
minimum we must pay who manages that staff.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-11-17 19:32:15 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-11-17 18:59:04 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |