Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence

From: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)drycafe(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Date: 2016-11-17 19:33:30
Message-ID: 8CAC9049-2400-41B3-B85A-C2585577AE7B@drycafe.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general


> On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> if we pay staff, at a minimum we must pay who manages that staff.

I don’t think that’s necessarily true. If the staff is a contractor, then whatever management is needed is normally factored into the rate. Or do you want to argue that even when paying independent contractors, there needs to be someone paid at SPI to manage those contractors? (Which I personally wouldn't agree with.)

-hilmar
--
Hilmar Lapp -:- lappland.io

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Allombert 2016-11-17 19:54:21 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-11-17 19:32:15 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence