Re: Member communications II

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
Subject: Re: Member communications II
Date: 2008-12-22 17:52:49
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:27 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> > motion.
> It is a motion for the sake of the board's recent failures to fulfill
> member's expectations, I think.

I am not arguing that.

What is the problem we are trying to solve?

The board's continual failures in communication and following protocol.

How does this motion address the problem any more than the other motions
that have already been passed?


Joshua D. Drake

Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 -
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2008-12-22 18:14:00 Re: Member communications II
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2008-12-22 17:28:30 Re: Member communications II