Re: Member communications II

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
Subject: Re: Member communications II
Date: 2008-12-22 17:28:30
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Member communications II"):
> On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 09:24 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> > > DRAFT RESOLUTION 2008-12-19.iwj.1
> With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> motion.

I would expect that if the Board passed that resolution we might not
see a repeat of the previous mistakes, where important decisions have
been made without any opportunity for anyone to comment ?

Or do you think you can assure us that we won't in any case see a
repeat of these problems ? And if so, on what basis ? After all
we've been `trying harder' for, well, years by now.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-12-22 17:52:49 Re: Member communications II
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-22 17:27:38 Re: Member communications II