Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES

From: Darren Benham <gecko(at)benham(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Date: 1999-03-31 00:20:32
Message-ID: 19990330162032.A11011@gecko.fortunet
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 03:59:24PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> How would the membership delegate those things? Election?
Err... I was just presenting contrasts...

> > In fact, any decision of the BOD or any committee should be overridable by
> > a vote of the membership.. but the process should be made troublesome
> > enough that every person with a hair on their pimple can't contest
> > everything.
> How about a petition scheme. If a petition is pgp signed by 10% of the
> membership then a vote will be taken which can override any decision of
> leadership?
I'd prefer a seconds approach, personally. Maybe 10% of the body "seconds"
it... but 10% of the people have to sign? 100+ signatures on one document?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you...

> > Another possibility is to let the people volunteer for the committee and
> > let the committee choose the head....
> That depends on the situation I would think but we need to have some kind
> of governing structure that approves these things. Hopefully simple.
The BOD accepts and appoints the committee members... no approval necessary
for them choosing their own leader.

Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
* <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko(at)debian(dot)org> <secretary(at)debian(dot)org> <webmaster(at)debian(dot)org> *
* <lintian-maint(at)debian(dot)org> *


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Lameter 1999-03-31 00:32:13 Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES
Previous Message Johnie Ingram 1999-03-31 00:00:10 Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES