Re: Ties in Elections

From: "Benj(dot) Mako Hill" <mako(at)bork(dot)hampshire(dot)edu>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ties in Elections
Date: 2003-02-06 06:15:19
Message-ID: 20030206061519.GB548@kamna
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:47:14AM -0500, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> While casting my vote for the 3 new board members, I noticed that the
> current voting procedure does not allow to explicitly express ties
> between candidates. I was told that Debian's Condorcet voting system
> does allow that, and I consider it a valuable option for voting. So
> maybe for the next election/vote this could be added?

I'm assuming that by "ties" you mean that you'd like to express equal
preference for two candidates. So something like, "I prefer X to Y and
Z (who I prefer equally) who I prefer to W." If so, this came up in
IRC at the beginning or immediately before the election began so
you're no the first person to request it.

Additionally, I would also appreciate seeing a "none of the above"
option in the next election.

Criticism aside, I've got a lot of faith in Condorcet and am glad to
see us electing board members in the way we do.


Benj. Mako Hill

Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results. --RMS


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven Luther 2003-02-06 06:25:17 Re: Ties in Elections
Previous Message Lukas Geyer 2003-02-06 05:47:14 Ties in Elections