| From: | David Graham <cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Updated issues list |
| Date: | 2003-02-23 22:36:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030223173148.N40394@localhost |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-bylaws |
> This still needs reducing. Please look at the summary under your name
> and see if you can't reduce the number of bullets. Try to generalize.
Ok, I think a new tack might be appropriate - other thoughts?
We should wipe everything from after article 2 - notwithstanding Jimmy
Kaplowitz' note about a contradiction in article 1 - on and start over,
keeping what we agree is good rather than removing what is not.
To do this I would suggest making a list of key points the by-laws must
have, and then together write the simplest possible by-laws that conform
to those points (such as membership rules/requirements, committee
charters, board rules, elections, and amendments), keeping them all
properly separated and in the spirit of SPI's charter and purpose. Looking
back over my points and everyone else's, I think "fixing" the by-laws
might be a bit too much of a bandaid solution, and rewriting them may well
be in order.
=--------------------------------------------------=
David "cdlu" Graham cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net
Guelph, Ontario SMS: +1 519 760 1409
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manoj Srivastava | 2003-02-24 03:00:43 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |
| Previous Message | Nick Phillips | 2003-02-23 20:38:22 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |