Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: John Hasler <jhasler(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting
Date: 2004-10-17 02:44:48
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 06:58:46PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > As I said in my reply to Bruce, I'm worried that there might be some
> > legal doubt about the validity of these email resolutions.
> Is there any chance of getting a legal opinion on the validity of email
> meetings? I wouldn't mind being proven wrong about them.

According to

> Actions may be taken without a meeting only if there is unanimous
> director consent. (This would appear to apply to e-mail voting.)

Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Perens 2004-10-17 02:54:10 Re: Efficient board meetings, revised
Previous Message John Hasler 2004-10-16 23:58:46 Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting