Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting

From: John Hasler <jhasler(at)debian(dot)org>
To: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting
Date: 2004-10-17 02:56:36
Message-ID: 87oej2gihn.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

I wrote:
> Is there any chance of getting a legal opinion on the validity of email
> meetings? I wouldn't mind being proven wrong about them.

Taral writes:
> According to http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-bylaws/2004/000265.html:

> Actions may be taken without a meeting only if there is unanimous
> director consent. (This would appear to apply to e-mail voting.)

I meant the opinion of an attorney as to whether email meetings would be
valid meetings under New York law. If the answer was yes we could consider
dropping IRC entirely.
--
John Hasler

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hasler 2004-10-17 03:11:55 Re: Efficient board meetings, revised
Previous Message Bruce Perens 2004-10-17 02:54:10 Re: Efficient board meetings, revised