Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting

From: "Benj(dot) Mako Hill" <mako(at)debian(dot)org>
To: spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2004-10-15.dbg.1: Non-meeting voting
Date: 2004-10-22 07:38:59
Message-ID: 20041022073859.GI14520@nozomi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:56:36PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Is there any chance of getting a legal opinion on the validity of email
> > meetings? I wouldn't mind being proven wrong about them.
> Taral writes:
> > According to
> > Actions may be taken without a meeting only if there is unanimous
> > director consent. (This would appear to apply to e-mail voting.)
> I meant the opinion of an attorney as to whether email meetings would be
> valid meetings under New York law. If the answer was yes we could consider
> dropping IRC entirely.

I talked to Greg a few days ago who certainly didn't know off the top
of his head but said he would look into it. :)


Benjamin Mako Hill

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2004-10-25 11:04:17 Re: Efficient board meetings, revised
Previous Message David Graham 2004-10-20 13:12:33 Re: Resolution 2004-05-04.dbg.2.iwj.1: Expedited financial problems solving