Re: Unfinished business

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfinished business
Date: 2004-11-01 04:13:40
Message-ID: 20041101041340.GB30260@yzma.clarkk.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:38:26AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Or is it a case that at the moment there is nothing that needs to be
> done? Perhaps there are things that need to be done, but require some
> other thing to happen first?
>
> I'm just surprised how quiet it is.

Well, there was the legal review (it's in the archives somewhere), but I
don't have access to the lawyer who provided that review, and I think
there are some unresolved issues. I will endeavor to chase this up.

--
Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jennifer A. Clark 2005-02-01 05:28:26 Popular soft - bottom prices
Previous Message Craig Small 2004-10-31 22:38:26 Unfinished business