| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Election results |
| Date: | 2007-08-07 18:02:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20070807180235.GB30493@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Aha:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:09:50PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> The one I found at https://members.spi-inc.org/vote/election.php?id=6
> says:
>
> Votes will be counted using the "Condorcet" election method system
> which will be used to select the most preferred candidate.
The bug is in the description, because it uses a question-begging
definition. Condorcet does not select the "most preferred"
candidate, unless you use a funny meaning of "most preferred". It
more accurately is described as a method to select the most agreed
upone candidate; that is, it tends to favour the choices that the
electors are willing to rank higher, but it does not guarantee
that the first choice of anyone wins.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
However important originality may be in some fields, restraint and
adherence to procedure emerge as the more significant virtues in a
great many others. --Alain de Botton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho | 2007-08-07 18:02:44 | Re: Election results |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-08-07 17:57:50 | Re: Election results |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho | 2007-08-07 18:02:44 | Re: Election results |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-08-07 17:57:50 | Re: Election results |