Re: proposed SPI resolution

From: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposed SPI resolution
Date: 2012-05-31 16:43:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Hi Bill,

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> SPI resolution
> 1. liaison is written with three vowels in a row.
> 2. liaison is mispelled near-systematically on the SPI mailing lists by non French speakers.

s/mispelled/misspelled/, s/non French/non-French/, (more arguable) s/near-systematically/nearly systematically/

> 3. this is bound to irritate the small number of French speakers which are subscribed
> to the SPI mailing lists (which, by the way, are wondering how English people
> pronounce it, assuming they can) even when they have an English-looking first name.

Usually the same way as in French (which I also speak), except probably with
the nasal French "on" replaced with either the Spanish "ón" or the English "on"
depending on the speaker.

> 4. there are less Latin speakers than French speakers subscriber to SPI
> mailing lists.

s/less/fewer/; s/subscriber/subscribed/

> 1. the word liaison will be replaced by ligatio in all SPI documents.
> 2. the non-words liason, laison and laiason will also be replaced by ligatio
> in all SPI documents for consistency.

Given that your proposal would be an SPI document, that would be interestingly

> 3. A small number of mispelling of ligatio will be encouraged to avoid an
> entropy imbalance.


> Respectfully submitted, Bill "no middle name" Allombert.

Merci pour l'avis! :-)

- Jimmy Kaplowitz

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Giovanni Mascellani 2012-05-31 22:41:23 Re: proposed SPI resolution
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-05-31 16:33:54 Re: proposed SPI resolution