Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
Cc: Stefano Sabatini <stefasab(at)gmail(dot)com>, SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project
Date: 2012-06-01 14:46:56
Message-ID: 20424.54752.717065.955584@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Robert Brockway writes ("Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project"):
> While I don't object to your objection (really) I did want to point out
> that this phrase has been in use in resolutions for a long time so I was
> surprised to see the objection appear now.

I'm sorry that I haven't spotted that earlier!

> I understand that Josh Berkus wrote the original version. My suspicion is
> that the 'proposal template' in question predates this.

Quite probably.

Ian.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2012-06-01 15:04:05 Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project
Previous Message Robert Brockway 2012-06-01 13:20:11 Re: FFmpeg as SPI associated project