Re: [Spi-private] Process problem with the election.

From: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Process problem with the election.
Date: 2006-07-14 04:05:41
Message-ID: 44B71815.604@perens.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

I'm sorry. I'm upset. You are right, the darned president announced my
platform that way, not the secretary. IMO, it's still mighty screwed-up
process. And right now I am wondering why I spent 75,000 miles on an
airplane last year going places for Free Software. You folks don't
always make it easy.

Bruce

Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:50:50PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
>> I am afraid that there's been a process problem with the election.
>>
>> The secretary, who is in charge of releasing the election platform
>> announcement, chose to announce my candidacy to spi-general by posting a
>> very large flame about me.
>>
>
> I should point out that John is neither the secretary nor in charge of
> releasing the election platform announcement. Both of those roles belong
> to David Graham, who had no involvement with that email. I'm somewhat
> disappointed that a current board member doesn't know the current
> officers.
>
> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
> jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-board mailing list
> Spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-board
>

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Perens 2006-07-14 04:10:24 Re: Process problem with the election.
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-14 04:01:09 Re: Process problem with the election.