Re: SPI resolution 2014-03-20.rtb.1 - Chakra as an associated project

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI resolution 2014-03-20.rtb.1 - Chakra as an associated project
Date: 2014-04-09 16:04:35
Message-ID: 53456F93.5040402@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 04/09/2014 11:22 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> | Foo Project does not currently have an agreed governance
> | structure; in the unlikely and unfortunate event that SPI would
> | have to decide between the wishes of competing factions, SPI would
> | do so based on the merits.

Not in a million years.

You're proposing that SPI would arbitrate project governance disputes,
which is something which we have already rejected for very good reasons.

Project charters need to have a definite and unequivocal explanation of
determining the liaison, regardless of that that method is.

So, -1000 from me.

--Josh Berkus

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message H W Tovetjärn 2014-04-09 17:40:09 Re: SPI resolution 2014-03-20.rtb.1 - Chakra as an associated project
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2014-04-09 15:22:20 Re: SPI resolution 2014-03-20.rtb.1 - Chakra as an associated project