Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)drycafe(dot)net>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Date: 2016-11-17 17:21:46
Message-ID: 8d279b6c-ec56-1e40-ec18-d3a5c172b708@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 11/17/2016 09:18 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> 2) SPI is a big enough NPO that it really should have at least one paid
>> administrative staff member. I believe that Drake previously proposed
>> something of the sort?
>
> I actually have, too, including at a Board meeting. I continue to feel that not paying someone for financial business operations, i.e., expecting open source software project community members to take enough delight in volunteering for otherwise mundane financial tasks to do them reliably, promptly, and well, is simply completely unrealistic at best, and at the level of SPI as an organization is unprofessional.

I am happy to work my social network to find recommendations for a
hireable candidate. But only if the Board wants to go ahead with this
(and can set a budget).

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-11-17 17:44:53 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Previous Message Hilmar Lapp 2016-11-17 17:18:43 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence