Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification

From: Will Lowe <harpo(at)UDel(dot)Edu>
To: Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au>
Cc: bruce(at)perens(dot)com, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification
Date: 1999-04-10 05:02:34
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95q.990410005327.400B-100000@gondolin
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

[multiple cc's removed]

> * OSI publically consult before granting any license OS status.

I agree. But how? At the moment there's considerable fragmentation among
the Free Software community. And asking for public consultation results
in utter chaos.

... the only way it worked the first time (Mozilla) was to ask a
few select people (Debian/Bruce, ESR, some others) to coordinate.


| harpo(at)udel(dot)edu lowe(at)cis(dot)udel(dot)edu lowe(at)debian(dot)org |
| |
| PGP Public Key: |


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Nelson 1999-04-10 05:08:20 Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification
Previous Message Anthony Towns 1999-04-10 04:47:06 Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification