| From: | Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | henrik(dot)ingo(at)avoinelama(dot)fi, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list) |
| Date: | 2016-10-27 00:46:42 |
| Message-ID: | eb215162-5fe5-988b-b09c-bd30fb94ef31@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi Henrik,
On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
>> course, which has to be)?
>>
> Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
> certain time will benefit or strengthen the position of the SPI member
> project or SPI itself. For example, any legal situation where a
> complaint needs to be raised by the opposite side within a certain
> date, and the strategy of SPI / the member project would be to just
> keep quiet until that date.
>
> henrik
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board? If so, could you estimate the frequency? If you do not know, could you provide a concrete example?
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filipus Klutiero | 2016-10-27 00:49:59 | Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list) |
| Previous Message | rhc@open-mpi.org | 2016-10-25 16:32:35 | Re: Resolution The Open MPI Project as an associated project |