Re: Bylaws Revision: VOTING[2]

I've done some more thinking about how SPI should work with respect to how
decisions are made. Below are my thoughts on the matter, now its just a
question of deciding on how to implement them in the voting system (if
people agree with them, that is).

Please comment- I think the general guidelines are fairly good, but I'm sure
there are details missing. (Ean- you commented on voting earlier when we
were discussing the membership- now's your chance! :)

Nils.

VOTING
------

- The voting procedures should be similar to a company and its stockholders.
- the system needs to relatively be fast and reactive, but needs checks and
balances to ensure the wishes of the membership are carried out by the board
- non contributing members should not be able to vote
- all votes (unless otherwise stated) are approved by a majority (>50%)

General
-------
- There are too many members to ask them to vote every time an issue is
raised, therefore the board acts on behalf of its members
- The board of directors together with the committees run the organization.
- the board of directors (and its committees) represent the membership and
acts in accordance with its wishes.
- from time to time the board of directors will pose questions to the
members when it is not clear how the membership feels about an issue

Board appointments
------------------
[this may go into the 'board' section of the bylaws, but its important to
keep an eye on in the voting section]
- the members will approve the appointments on the board of directors
- the members ultimately control the actions of the organization
- removal of board members
.. this should be relatively difficult... 2/3 majority vote of the board or
of the membership maybe?

Resolutions
-----------
- resolutions are voted on by the board of directors
- Members and committes may put resolutions before the board of directors
for voting
- Members have the power to override the board of directors by a majority
vote

--
Nils Lohner Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
E-Mail: lohner(at)spi-inc(dot)org PO Box 1326
Board Of Directors <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org> Boston, Ma. 02117 USA

On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:00:37AM -0400, Nils Lohner wrote:
> VOTING
> ------
>
> - The voting procedures should be similar to a company and its stockholders.
> - the system needs to relatively be fast and reactive, but needs checks and
These seem to contradict.. ;)

> balances to ensure the wishes of the membership are carried out by the board
> - non contributing members should not be able to vote
> - all votes (unless otherwise stated) are approved by a majority (>50%)
Majorit of what.. votes or voters? If it's the former, then 6 people could
decide something if only 10 vote when membership is over 100.. If it's the latter,
then what do we do if only 10 people vote?

> Resolutions
> -----------
> - resolutions are voted on by the board of directors
> - Members and committes may put resolutions before the board of directors
> for voting
> - Members have the power to override the board of directors by a majority
> vote
Would "this" be the place to mention that

--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko(at)debian(dot)org> <secretary(at)debian(dot)org> <lintian-maint(at)debian(dot)org> *
* <webmaster(at)debian(dot)org> <gecko(at)fortunet(dot)com> <webmaster(at)spi-inc(dot)org> *
=========================================================================