| Lists: | spi-general |
|---|
| From: | Josip Rodin <joy(at)srce(dot)hr> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | non-profit in NY, MA, IN, etc |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 15:34:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20040712153444.GA31115@keid.carnet.hr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi,
Our donations web page says that we're a non-profit corporation under the
laws of New York State. The IRS data indicates Boston, Massachusetts. Our
address is Indianapolis, Indiana and can be anywhere. It seems to me that it
would be advisable to explain the relevance of all this, or simply say that
it's non-profit in the USA and be done with it.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
| From: | Steve Greenland <steveg(at)moregruel(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: non-profit in NY, MA, IN, etc |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 16:20:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20040712162050.GA20025@moregruel.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 12-Jul-04, 10:34 (CDT), Josip Rodin <joy(at)srce(dot)hr> wrote:
> Our donations web page says that we're a non-profit corporation under the
> laws of New York State. The IRS data indicates Boston, Massachusetts. Our
> address is Indianapolis, Indiana and can be anywhere. It seems to me that it
> would be advisable to explain the relevance of all this, or simply say that
> it's non-profit in the USA and be done with it.
It's not quite that simple. The 501c3 status is a federal tax code
thing. State tax codes may are may not use identical criteria, and may
or may not recognize 501c3 for the purposes of state income tax.
Probably the best thing is to say that SPI is 501c3 corporation (or
whatever the exact, legal designation is), and let individuals determine
how that affects them and their taxes.
Which probably amounts to your last sentence, but we want to be careful
about exactly what we imply with our phrasing, and I'm a little
concerned that "non-profit in the USA" is a little over-reaching.
Regards,
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
| From: | John Hasler <john(at)dhh(dot)gt(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: non-profit in NY, MA, IN, etc |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 17:06:21 |
| Message-ID: | 874qodrw8i.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Steve Greenland writes:
> Which probably amounts to your last sentence, but we want to be careful
> about exactly what we imply with our phrasing, and I'm a little concerned
> that "non-profit in the USA" is a little over-reaching.
Yes. The term "non-profit" (or "not for profit") does not imply
deductability of donations.
--
John Hasler
john(at)dhh(dot)gt(dot)org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI