Reasons to join SPI...

Lists: spi-general
From: Peter Makholm <peter(at)makholm(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Reasons to join SPI...
Date: 2001-10-25 21:44:24
Message-ID: 87y9lz9yyv.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

... or why I havn't applied for a membership. (yet?)

After Nils Lohner has written something about SPI membership on
debain-private I have looked at the SPI website to decide wether it
was interesting for me.

I don't think it's good for an organization if 75% af it's members
just applied for membership and then forgets all about SPI until the
membership should be renewed.

So I don't want to be a member of an organisation just because it's
free and I'm allowed to be a member. There should be a reason for me
to be a member. So what I need is 5 reasons to apply for membership of
SPI. Reasons that isn't fufilled by being Debian Developer and active
in the local LUG and on a national level (Denmark).

I agree that the purpose of SPI mentioned in the bylaws is important
but how do I work more efficient for these goals as a member of SPI?

--
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat".
-- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix


From: csmall(at)eye-net(dot)com(dot)au (Craig Small)
To: Peter Makholm <peter(at)makholm(dot)net>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reasons to join SPI...
Date: 2001-10-26 12:26:26
Message-ID: 20011026222626.B12957@eye-net.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:44:24PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> After Nils Lohner has written something about SPI membership on
> debain-private I have looked at the SPI website to decide wether it
> was interesting for me.
>
> I don't think it's good for an organization if 75% af it's members
> just applied for membership and then forgets all about SPI until the
> membership should be renewed.

I'd have to agree with this. There really should be some blurb
somewhere about why people would want to join. The reasons for joining
Debian are far easier to work out and even that gets people confused
sometimes.

- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall(at)eye-net(dot)com(dot)au>
MIEEE <csmall(at)ieee(dot)org> Debian developer <csmall(at)debian(dot)org>


From: Dale E Martin <dmartin(at)cliftonlabs(dot)com>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reasons to join SPI...
Date: 2001-10-29 17:48:09
Message-ID: 20011029124809.A30664@clifton-labs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

> What should SPI be doing to further the goals of free software?
>
> Look around the 'net today.
>
> DMCA and other legistations are threatening freedoms that we hold dear.
> What could/should we be doing about this? If people want to work on
> this issue, they could do so under the SPI umbrella.
>
> Cryptography and privacy regulations can use work. The legislators who
> make the laws aren't necessarily the most informed on the new
> technologies and their uses. How can we educate them and help them
> understand the technologies so that they can pass better laws?

I think to approach this (in the US) SPI could try to get in a position to
hire a lobbiest. I've been thinking that this is probably a good time for
some Free Software organization to start working with the system on this
level, and I think SPI might be a great organization to do it.

[snipped your other comments, I think they all apply but I think I'm most
interested in the political/social change issues that SPI could address.]

> SPI without a membership is just a legal framework for Debian, but with a
> membership it becomes an organization that can attempt to move on issues
> that are key to the development of the 'net. This is also why the
> membership is important: SPI without a membership (and just a board of
> directors) may not always reflect the concerns of the community. With a
> membership, SPI becomes a _representation_ of the community, and can
> involve itself in issues that decide the future of that very community.

And can work within the current system to affect a change. I personally
feel that governments all over the world should be changing to Free
Software for all of their needs. It "only makes sense" on many levels.
Here in the US for that to happen I think we need a lobby to make it happen.

> I'm hoping that spi-general will become a sounding board for the memebrs
> and others in the community, and that the issues brought up there will
> drive SPI to action.

I'm trying to provide my own input here. I'm sure the US slant will spark
some more discussion, which would be great.

Later,
Dale
--
Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc.
Senior Computer Engineer
dmartin(at)cliftonlabs(dot)com
http://www.cliftonlabs.com
pgp key available